OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria Compilers Available Soon

• Posted by Brian Broker <bkb at CNW.COM> Apr 03, 2000
• 411 views

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 19:00:13 GMT, Mike The Spike wrote:

>>Hell, why not share your faster interpretter?  Or did you not save your
>>code from that stage of your project?
>
>Didn't I just say "U4IA++ started out as a faster Euphoria interpretter"?
>I think it's obvious from that line the U4IA++ used "to be" the
>interpretter, since "it started out as" an interpretter.
>Why do I have to repeat myself?

You don't have to repeat yourself... that's why I added the second
question.  If at one point I had a Euphoria interpretter that was faster
than the one from RDS, then I would have saved that code and shared my
implementation with those who write programs with Euphoria.  *Then* I would
have proceeded with making a compiler (but I would still save the code for
this faster interpretter so that I could back up my claims).  That's all...

You've got to expect a little skepticism when you make claims that you
can't immediately back up.  (Sorry for being a skeptic, I will not make any
further comments until you've released something that I can comment on.)

-- Brian