Re: mathmatical question.. - Reply
On Fri, 30 May 1997 11:23:34 +1200 "BABOR, JIRI" <J.Babor at GNS.CRI.NZ>
writes:
>---------------------- Information from the mail header
>
>Lee woo seob posed a mathematical problem (his words, not mine), he
>can do
>palette shuffling and/or pixel color detection well enough on his own
>- see his
>snow poem program on The Official Euphoria Page. He also emphasized
>"INSIDE the
>polygon" (his capitals, not mine!), and that is why my routine would
>not even
>detect your boundary (vertex) point. (Btw, *odd* count indicates the
>point *is* inside)
>And how is triangulation going to help anything? Pure magic? Jiri
not triangulaion.
Triangulation is finding a point by using three reference points.
I propose cutting the image into triangles because a triangle
is the fewest sided polygon. It can't a concave shape.
____
/\ \ /
/__\ /____\
As this image shows even a 4 sided figure can have a concave
shape giving the possibility of an inaccurate COUNT.
and BTW My thought of going in opposite directions doesn't
work either for the same reason your count won't.
____
| | the dot is where the click was made.
| |
| /\.|
|/ \|
____
| | this line gives a count of 4.
| |
_|_/\_|_
|/ \|
____
| | the dot is where the click was made.
| .|
| /\ |
|/ \|
____
| |
_|____|_ this line gives a count of 3.
| /\ | BOTH clicks are inside.
|/ \|
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|