Re: [phix] if 'number' then why not 'list' ?
- Posted by katsmeow Feb 21, 2021
- 823 views
petelomax said...
If you had bothered to read even the first line of the manual you would know that classes are much closer to types than include statements.
I don't know where my reply to that went, but it's been 5 minutes or so...
Since i was working around the type system to make shared variables possible, i first considered type. But type as implemented in OE, doesn't let the programmer know the variable name being type-checked. I had to jump hoops to get that data. And the code written (procedures and functions) aren't exclusively naturally available to the variable the type check was written for. And finally, the resulting code block would/could look like an include file. Which is how i got to asking about "class" vs "include as".
Kat
