Re: wikipedia draft

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

I agree with Kat, here. Of course Phix should be in Wikipedia. It is something that exists in our universe of which we (humanity) have knowledge.

That's what an encyclopedia is for: documenting our knowledge and providing information regarding that knowledge.

I read the criticism of the article (by the Wiki editor) and disagree completely. Pete is the best source for telling us what Phix is, of course.

To me, the article sounded matter-of-fact, not at all like an advertisement.

Anyway, this is why I generally avoid the biased trash that is Wikipedia except to obtain other citations.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu