Re: Discuss changing the behaviour of append()
- Posted by jimcbrown (admin) Jun 22, 2014
- 3407 views
Jim, Shawn, Derek,
I haven't been making ad hominem attacks.
Denial won't help you.
He thinks that because I said something about monoids I wanted changes.
I had repeatedly said I didn't
I never stated this. I did call a "proposed change" making append gain the properties of associtivity and identity, but this was just to emphasis that today, without Derek's idea of allowing atoms in the first argument of append, append still lacks those properties. It always did.
If load_map doesn't work
I asked you before what about load_map() was broken: http://openeuphoria.org/forum/m/124614.wc
You didn't answer then, which now makes me think that it's because you can't.
Jim outed me of course.
I have no recollection of this. I admit that I'm not sorry to see you go, but, wait, you are still here!
