Re: Raspberry Pi revisited

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
mattlewis said...

Err...ok? Shouldn't we all be dismissive of typos? Why are we still talking about this?

Matt

Because he supplied different information, and i was wanting a [citation needed] answer. For a simple brain-dead embedded processor (environment control, washing machine, security system), 512K is fine, for a standalone computer with an OS, 512M may not be enough. But the same card could be offered with both configurations (or 3 or 4 configs), and EUWX could just as easily made his typo on card version designations instead of memory size.

useless

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu