Re: New switch/case idea
- Posted by kinz Apr 07, 2009
- 1643 views
kinz said...
kinz said...
BEu said...
switch X -- pure switch case a ?1 case b ? else ?3 end switch
cascade X -- instead of switch with fallthrou stage a ?1 stage b ?2 break else ?3 end cascade
I saw Niagara in my dream yesterday ...
It seems to be not that bad, but I can do cyclic switch and cascade in bilingual mode ...
switch X do -- cyclic switch, thanks to 'do' keyword case a ?1 case b X+=1 else exit end switch
cascade X do -- cyclic caskade, thanks to 'do' keyword stage a ?1 stage b X-=1 else exit end cascade
BEu
Yes, I just didn't see Niagara turned up-down, up-down ...
Maybe we can delete some doubles, BEu, let's try:
try X [do] -- with 'do' cyclic, without 'do' simple one go stage a ?1 -- cascadeing part stage b X-=1 case c ?2 -- switching part case d ?3 else exit end try
Hmm... Hmm... Seems to work in bilingual mode too ...