Re: Euphoria vs. other programming languages

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
CChris said...
jeremy said...

The only feasable thing that could be done to make it better would be to remove the global keyword, but this has serious consequences for legacy code, which is why it remains.

And would be very silly. Rather, use various mechanisms to prevent the need for global identifiers, so as to use them as sparingly as they should.

This is exactly what we're doing: providing superior alternatives to using global scope. You still haven't figured it out, as evidenced by your comments. Why would removing global be silly (aside from legacy concerns)?

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu