1. RE: IDE v0.13.0 released
- Posted by Ray Smith <smithr at ix.net.au> May 26, 2002
- 401 views
Judith wrote: > The latest IDE v0.13.0 is released. There are many changes with this > release. Hi Judith, I'm not a user of your IDE but I usually check out each release. I'd like to congratulate you on an excellent job. The IDE project looks very professional and (with Win32lib) is by far the biggest and most flexible application I have seen written in Euphoria! It's easy to see you have put a huge amount of work into the project. Thanks, Ray Smith http://rays-web.com
2. RE: IDE v0.13.0 released
- Posted by Judith <camping at txcyber.com> May 27, 2002
- 404 views
Thanks, Ray, your comments are very much appreciated. IDE has been a long evolution and I've learned a lot doing it. I did not know anything about writing a program for Windows when I began so I've made my share of errors and probably still do routines the hard way. But I'm getting lots of excellent help from more experienced Windows programmers and eventually IDE will be more efficient. If I could just get by these problems with different versions of IDE, Win32lib and Eu that have cropped up with v0.13.0 (properly numbered I think<sigh>)! Judith Ray Smith wrote: > > Judith wrote: > > The latest IDE v0.13.0 is released. There are many changes with this > > release. > > > Hi Judith, > > I'm not a user of your IDE but I usually check out each release. > > I'd like to congratulate you on an excellent job. The IDE project > looks very professional and (with Win32lib) is by far the biggest and > most flexible application I have seen written in Euphoria! > > It's easy to see you have put a huge amount of work into the project. > > Thanks, > > Ray Smith > http://rays-web.com > > >
3. RE: IDE v0.13.0 released
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> May 27, 2002
- 415 views
On 27 May 2002, at 11:53, Judith wrote: > > Thanks, Ray, your comments are very much appreciated. > > IDE has been a long evolution and I've learned a lot doing it. I did not > know anything about writing a program for Windows when I began so I've > made my share of errors and probably still do routines the hard way. But > I'm getting lots of excellent help from more experienced Windows > programmers and eventually IDE will be more efficient. If I could just > get by these problems with different versions of IDE, Win32lib and Eu > that have cropped up with v0.13.0 (properly numbered I think<sigh>)! 13 is a good number to some! Kat