1. Re: ex bloatware
- Posted by Robert B Pilkington <bpilkington at JUNO.COM> Jun 21, 1998
- 744 views
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998 10:04:21 +1200 "BABOR, JIRI" <J.Babor at GNS.CRI.NZ> writes: >Robert Craig wrote: > >> * if I change AND and OR to operate in the short-circuit >> manner, existing programs will break. I had no trouble >> finding at least 3 programs on the Euphoria Web site >> that would break if short-circuit were used (since function >> calls might be skipped). > >Small price to pay. Please, break them! Jiri > Hmmm, a new keyword, "with short_circut", that would default to "without short_circut"?? Unless a "with short_circut" is encountered, the short_circuts are automatically off. I don't know how valuable short-circuting would be, though. I haven't done anything that would visibly benefit from it. But that's just me... As for the ~180k size with EX.EXE's bound programs, I think that for large programs, the size is very acceptable, but for a small program (say binding a modified BUZZ.EX for a friend), the size is a bit big. All that means is that I need to give my friend EX.EXE and shroud all my files to give him, and include .BAT files to execute the stuff. Oh, and when it comes to EXW.EXE's bound files, the size is average in comparison to the norm. Maybe smaller, if the programs were big enough. (Haven't seen any big Win32 programs yet..... But taking into account how slowly files grow due to shrouding when bound.) _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]