1. Web Site Performance Degradation

It seems the web site is performing pretty badly these days. Clicking on a forum post link takes up to 10 seconds or more to appear. Has something changed recently to cause this? Anybody know how to run performance testing on the site?

Maybe it's just me...

new topic     » topic index » view message » categorize

2. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

euphoric said...

It seems the web site is performing pretty badly these days. Clicking on a forum post link takes up to 10 seconds or more to appear. Has something changed recently to cause this? Anybody know how to run performance testing on the site?

Maybe it's just me...

I think this is just an issue with our provider. Considering how cheap this host is, well, you get what you pay for.

# ping google.com 
PING google.com (74.125.228.72) 56(84) bytes of data. 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=29.2 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=29.1 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=28.8 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=29.1 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=29.0 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=29.1 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=30.5 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=30.7 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=29.5 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=29.2 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=29.3 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=29.3 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=26 ttl=50 time=29.2 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=30 ttl=50 time=29.5 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=31 ttl=50 time=29.2 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=32 ttl=50 time=29.4 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=29.4 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=40 ttl=50 time=29.3 ms 
64 bytes from iad23s07-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.228.72): icmp_seq=43 ttl=50 time=29.3 ms 
 
--- google.com ping statistics --- 
44 packets transmitted, 19 received, 56% packet loss, time 43682ms 
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.843/29.421/30.762/0.464 ms 
#  

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

3. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

Should we pay a little more?

This is probably just intermittent, right? Because now it seems better...

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

4. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

euphoric said...

Should we pay a little more?

This is probably just intermittent, right? Because now it seems better...

It does appear to be intermittent. It was slow again this morning, after being reasonably quick for a while.

Could it be a DNS problem because it has been moved recently?

Arthur

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

5. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

ArthurCrump said...
euphoric said...

Should we pay a little more?

This is probably just intermittent, right? Because now it seems better...

It does appear to be intermittent. It was slow again this morning, after being reasonably quick for a while.

Could it be a DNS problem because it has been moved recently?

Arthur

It wasn't moved recently? Why would you think it was?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

6. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

jimcbrown said...

It wasn't moved recently? Why would you think it was?

Because of this? 'twas only a month ago.

jimcbrown said...

Notice of server downtime.

The site was down from to Saturday, March 22 at 8:42 ET to some time after Sunday, March 23 6:00PM ET while our host physically moved the hardware hosting our server from Dumore, PA to Charlotte, NC.

We apologize for the late notice. Our host did not give us any advance notice on the move.

-Greg

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

7. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

ArthurCrump said...

Could it be a DNS problem because it has been moved recently?

jimcbrown said...

It wasn't moved recently? Why would you think it was?

ghaberek said...

Because of this? 'twas only a month ago.

jimcbrown said...

Notice of server downtime.

The site was down from to Saturday, March 22 at 8:42 ET to some time after Sunday, March 23 6:00PM ET while our host physically moved the hardware hosting our server from Dumore, PA to Charlotte, NC.

We apologize for the late notice. Our host did not give us any advance notice on the move.

-Greg

Ah, that makes sense. I guess the mention of DNS threw me off.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

8. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

When the response is slow I noticed that the client is waiting for a response

from AJAX. Is that being used by the host or Open Euphoria ?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

9. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

BRyan said...

When the response is slow I noticed that the client is waiting for a response

from AJAX. Is that being used by the host or Open Euphoria ?

AJAX is used by the Open Euphoria website. We maintain our own webserver, so this has nothing to do with the host.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

10. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

jimcbrown said...
BRyan said...

When the response is slow I noticed that the client is waiting for a response

from AJAX. Is that being used by the host or Open Euphoria ?

AJAX is used by the Open Euphoria website. We maintain our own webserver, so this has nothing to do with the host.

I don't know anything about AJAX , maybe someone that is an expert can take a look at It.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

11. Re: Web Site Performance Degradation

BRyan said...
jimcbrown said...
BRyan said...

When the response is slow I noticed that the client is waiting for a response

from AJAX. Is that being used by the host or Open Euphoria ?

AJAX is used by the Open Euphoria website. We maintain our own webserver, so this has nothing to do with the host.

I don't know anything about AJAX , maybe someone that is an expert can take a look at It.

I believe this to be a symptom rather than a cause, based on the information I provided earlier in this thread.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view message » categorize

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu